Deliver us from evil_forLit Read online




  J. F. SAWYER

  DELIVER US FROM EVIL

  IN­T­RO­DUC­TI­ON

  FO­RE­WARD

  I - The Ac­cur­sed Inn

  II - Pos­ses­sed

  III - Unk­nown Vi­si­tor On A Win­ter's Night

  IV - Sa­tan's Da­ugh­ter

  V - De­mon In The Ho­use

  VI - You See, He Put A Cur­se On You

  VII - To Dwell With A De­vil

  VI­II - The Vo­odoo Doll

  IX - Ha­un­ting In New Ha­ven

  X - The Inc­re­dib­le Ca­se Of Ma­ria

  XI - The Ghosts of West Po­int

  XII - De­li­ver Us From Evil

  XI­II - The Ca­se Of Do­ug­las De­an

  GLOS­SARY

  INTRODUCTION

  The su­per­na­tu­ral - a vast area wit­hin which man's ac­cep­ted know­led­ge and be­li­efs no lon­ger hold true. It is a world of ter­rif­ying po­wers and night­ma­res; of vo­ices from now­he­re, fo­ots­teps in empty ro­oms; of de­mons and cur­ses and ap­pa­ri­ti­ons; a world whe­re fe­ar re­igns! But it can al­so be an area of gent­le­ness and charm, of help­ful en­ti­ti­es at­temp­ting to aid tho­se of the physi­cal world.

  Man is cons­tantly se­eking new fron­ti­ers for in­ves­ti­ga­ti­on, trying to le­arn all the­re is to know abo­ut li­fe and the phe­no­me­na which inf­lu­en­ces it. The­re is a fron­ti­er which so­me co­ura­ge­o­us in­di­vi­du­als ha­ve be­en stud­ying sin­ce the be­gin­ning of ti­me, alt­ho­ugh man­kind as a who­le has re­fu­sed to - or has be­en af­ra­id to - exp­lo­re it: the re­gi­on of the world be­yond.

  To da­te, only the most int­re­pid so­uls ha­ve da­red to le­ave the light of the ac­cep­ted uni­ver­se to tra­vel the dark path­ways of the unk­nown. Man has al­ways fe­ared the unk­nown; but when that which was unk­nown is exp­la­ined to him and be­co­mes comp­re­hen­sib­le, he le­arns to to­le­ra­te it and so no lon­ger fe­ar it. Ma­ke known the area of psychic phe­no­me­na to him, and he will no lon­ger dre­ad it. This, then, is the ro­le of the psychic in­ves­ti­ga­tor. This is the task which Ed and Lor­ra­ine War­ren ha­ve set out to ac­comp­lish.

  Although ar­tists by pro­fes­si­on, the War­rens ha­ve be­en se­ri­o­usly in­ves­ti­ga­ting the su­per­na­tu­ral for over twenty-se­ven ye­ars, tra­ve­ling thro­ug­ho­ut the Uni­ted Sta­tes and ab­ro­ad, re­se­arc­hing, and in re­cent ye­ars, lec­tu­ring on the­ir dis­co­ve­ri­es.

  Ed War­ren's in­te­rest stems from his child­ho­od in Brid­ge­port, Con­nec­ti­cut, whe­re he li­ved with his fa­mily in a ha­un­ted ho­me. His fat­her, ho­we­ver, was a de­vo­ut Cat­ho­lic and re­fu­sed, in spi­te of con­ti­nu­o­us pa­ra­nor­mal oc­cur­ren­ces suf­fe­red by every mem­ber of the ho­use­hold, to al­low a be­li­ef in ghosts. In la­ter ye­ars, Ed War­cen be­gan trying to pro­ve that ot­her pe­op­le ex­pe­ri­en­ced the sa­me phe­no­me­na that he, as a child, had wit­nes­sed.

  Lorraine has na­tu­ral­ly al­ways be­en fas­ci­na­ted by psychic oc­cur­ren­ces sin­ce she is a sen­si­ti­ve and has be­en ha­ving cla­ir­vo­yant ex­pe­ri­en­ces all of her li­fe. Alt­ho­ugh at first she was only slightly mo­re sen­si­ti­ve that the ma­j­ority of pe­op­le (ever­yo­ne is psychic and has the abi­lity to de­ve­lop his or her psychic po­wers to a gre­ater deg­ree) Lor­ra­ine's po­wers gra­du­al­ly grew stron­ger. The mo­re su­per­na­tu­ral hap­pe­nings she ex­pe­ri­en­ces, the mo­re her cla­ir­vo­yan­ce de­ve­lops.

  When Ed and Lor­ra­ine we­re first mar­ri­ed, at eigh­te­en, they used wha­te­ver mo­ney they ear­ned from the sa­le of the­ir pa­in­tings to tra­vel to va­ri­o­us ha­un­ted ho­uses. They wo­uld sketch each ho­use and le­arn all they co­uld abo­ut its his­tory, me­anw­hi­le trying to ex­pe­ri­en­ce wha­te­ver it was pos­sib­le for them to ex­pe­ri­en­ce of the ha­un­ting. From the very first ca­se, they kept a ca­re­ful re­cord of every in­ves­ti­ga­ti­on they con­duc­ted, so that they now ha­ve a few tho­usand tho­ro­ughly do­cu­men­ted his­to­ri­es.

  Until just a few ye­ars ago, the War­rens' in­te­rest in the oc­cult was known to only a few clo­se fri­ends. Then one day a col­lec­ti­on of pa­in­tings Ed had do­ne abo­ut so­me of his mo­re me­mo­rab­le ca­ses was se­en by an art show pro­mo­ter who as­ked Ed to ex­hi­bit them. Ed was at the show to ans­wer any qu­es­ti­ons the vi­si­tors might ha­ve had abo­ut the su­per­na­tu­ral. Sin­ce that ti­me, the War­rens ha­ve be­en on the go cons­tantly, in­ves­ti­ga­ting, lec­tu­ring, and do­ing ra­dio and te­le­vi­si­on shows. Mem­bers of the me­di­cal pro­fes­si­on and even of the clergy are now con­tac­ting the War­rens for help in both hu­man (ghostly) and in­hu­man (de­mo­nic) ha­un­tings.

  Of co­ur­se, they ha­ve pa­id the pri­ce for the­ir in­te­rest thro­ugh many cur­ses and stran­ge ac­ci­dents. No mat­ter how se­ri­o­us the con­se­qu­en­ces, they fe­el that they ha­ve to ke­ep on with the­ir re­se­arch and bring the re­sults to the pub­lic. As the War­rens po­int out, the dan­ger in de­aling with psychic phe­no­me­na is in not kno­wing eno­ugh. It cer­ta­inly is no fi­eld for ama­te­urs. The­ir pur­po­se in pre­sen­ting the­ir lec­tu­re prog­rams is to in­te­rest mo­re pe­op­le in le­ar­ning to be­co­me psychic re­se­arc­hers so that gre­ater know­led­ge will even­tu­al­ly be bro­ught forth.

  Man is cons­tantly se­eking new fron­ti­ers for in­ves­ti­ga­ti­on, fo­re­ver trying to le­arn all that he can abo­ut his earthly li­fe; is it not al­so worthw­hi­le for him to le­arn all that he can con­cer­ning his eter­nal li­fe?

  The sto­ri­es which fol­low are all comp­le­tely true ca­ses. Ho­we­ver, the na­mes of per­sons li­ving or de­ad ha­ve be­en chan­ged for the pro­tec­ti­on of tho­se in­vol­ved, as ha­ve the na­mes of bu­il­dings.

  FOREWARD

  The Thoughts Of Ed Warren

  The case histories that you will be reading about in this book concern mainly witchcraft and demonology. I realize that many readers will regard these subjects as sheer nonsense, remnants of the superstitious beliefs of times long past. Yet, there are those among you who are open minded enough to give serious thought to such ideas.

  Men of sci­en­ce - doc­tors, physi­cists, bi­olo­gists and even psychi­at­rists - co­uld be­ne­fit gre­atly if they wo­uld lo­ok mo­re clo­sely in­to the fi­eld of pa­rapsyc­ho­logy, es­pe­ci­al­ly if they wo­uld con­cern them­sel­ves not only with ext­ra sen­sory per­cep­ti­on and its re­la­ti­on to the­ir fi­elds, but al­so with the vast amo­unts of evi­den­ce of both hu­man and de­mo­nic ha­un­tings. I wo­uld li­ke to re­fer the­se men to ins­ti­tu­ti­ons such as Du­ke Uni­ver­sity, Ge­or­ge­town Uni­ver­sity and Hos­pi­tal, and St. Pa­ul's Uni­ver­sity and Hos­pi­tal, whe­re they co­uld le­arn of inc­re­dib­le ca­ses of pos­ses­si­on bro­ught abo­ut by ne­ga­ti­ve for­ces. In the ca­se of one fo­ur­te­en ye­ar old boy, the of­fi­ci­als of the two hos­pi­tals and three uni­ver­si­ti­es men­ti­oned abo­ve all ve­ri­fi­ed that the boy was un­der the inf­lu­en­ce of ama­zing su­per­na­tu­ral for­ces. Dr. J. B. Rhi­ne of Du­ke Uni­ver­sity sa­id it was the most fan­tas­tic ca­se he had ever en­co­un­te­red in all the ye­ars of his in­ves­ti­ga­ti­ons. The many doc­tors who exa­mi­ned the boy co­uld find no lo­gi­cal re­ason, of any kind, for his be­ha­vi­or. In fact, the ma­ni­fes­ta­ti­ons we­re of such a na­tu­re that no hos­pi­tal or sa­ni­ta­ri­um wo­uld ac­cept the boy du­ring the ti­me that the exor­cism ri­tes we­re be­ing con­duc­ted. (This ca­se has sin­
ce be­en chan­ged slightly and ma­de in­to a very po­pu­lar bo­ok and mo­vie.)

  Many pe­op­le ask, "Why do you use ma­inly re­li­gi­o­us spon­so­red ins­ti­tu­ti­ons such as Ge­or­ge­town Uni­ver­sity and St. Pa­ul's Uni­ver­sity for cor­ro­bo­ra­ti­on?" Whe­re de­mo­no­logy is con­cer­ned, the ans­wer is simp­le. Be­ca­use they are re­li­gi­o­us or­ga­ni­za­ti­ons (in this ca­se, Jesu­it), they ha­ve gre­at know­led­ge per­ta­ining to the su­bj­ect of de­mo­no­logy and how to de­al with it. Of co­ur­se, sin­ce all the gre­at re­li­gi­ons are de­eply in­te­res­ted in the fight aga­inst the for­ces of de­mo­no­logy, tho­se in­vol­ved in wor­king for the­se re­li­gi­ons must ne­ces­sa­rily be open-min­ded abo­ut a su­per­na­tu­ral world. The evi­den­ce that they col­lect wo­uld be of gre­at help in our work.

  When the aut­hor of this bo­ok spe­aks of the per­for­man­ce of exor­cism in so­me of the­se ca­ses, ple­ase ke­ep in mind that every re­li­gi­on, be it Cat­ho­li­cism, Juda­ism or Bud­dism, has so­me form of exor­cism ri­te in its doct­ri­nes. Exor­cism is a se­ri­es of an­ci­ent pra­yers used for the cas­ting out Of de­mons.

  I was bro­ught up as a Ro­man Cat­ho­lic and, of co­ur­se I be­li­eve in the te­ac­hings of Cat­ho­li­cism. I do not want to be mi­sun­ders­to­od, I am not so nar­row-min­ded to dis­miss any ot­her re­li­gi­on. I be­li­eve that any re­li­gi­on which te­ac­hes the lo­ve of our fel­low man and the lo­ve of God is ba­sed on a so­und fo­un­da­ti­on. Be­ca­use I was bro­ught up as a Cat­ho­lic, 1 tend to use Cat­ho­lic met­hods in my work. If I we­re in one of the de­epest jung­les of the world whe­re so-cal­led "pri­mi­ti­ve" witch doc­tors of.1 go­od na­tu­re we­re pre­sent, I wo­uld not he­si­ta­te lor a mo­ment to ask for the­ir help in exor­cism ri­tes. (io­od co­mes in many forms and can be just as po­tent, just as help­ful, in pe­op­le we might re­gard.is pri­mi­ti­ve and il­li­te­ra­te.

  I be­li­eve that the­re are po­si­ti­ve and ne­ga­ti­ve su­per­na­tu­ral for­ces that can and so­me­ti­mes do ma­ni­pu­la­te our way of thin­king and our way of li­fe. I be­li­eve that even to­day, in our mo­dern, sci­en­ti­fic so­ci­ety, de­mons are just as much a thre­at as they we­re twenty cen­tu­ri­es ago when a man cal­led Jesus pre­ac­hed many war­nings abo­ut them. If I am wrong in my be­li­efs, they can harm no One. If I am right and am ta­ken se­ri­o­usly, I can help many. At one high scho­ol whe­re I lec­tu­red, they aa­id that I frigh­te­ned the stu­dents with my talk of the­se ma­lign for­ces. My ans­wer to this wai, "Thank God. It only pro­ves to me that they we­re re­al­ly lis­te­ning!"

  As you re­ad the­se pa­ges, be lo­gi­cal in yo­ur thin­king, but re­ma­in open-min­ded. I do not for one mi­nu­te ex­pect you to be­li­eve everyt­hing that is re­la­ted to you in this bo­ok; I only atk you to think abo­ut it se­ri­o­usly whi­le you are re­ading it and then ask yo­ur­self, "Is the­re a chan­ce that the­se pe­op­le may be right? If they are, what do­es it me­an to me, per­so­nal­ly?" I ha­ve se­en at­he­ists call on God, chan­ging the­ir way of thin­king over­night when they've be­co­me in­vol­ved with ne­ga­ti­ve su­per­na­tu­ral for­ces.

  When one steps in­to the world of dark­ness, he had best go well pre­pa­red. A very wi­se man on­ce sa­id to me, "Ed, I wo­uld not go in­to so­me of the ho­mes and com­mu­ni­ca­te with the en­ti­ti­es that you do for any pri­ce, es­pe­ci­al­ly whe­re de­mo­nic for­ces are con­cer­ned!" On­ce you cross the thres­hold, you will be in gre­at dan­ger, as will be tho­se whom you lo­ve. The ne­ga­ti­ve for­ces aga­inst which you are wor­king are cle­ver, for they pos­sess the cun­ning and know­led­ge of the ages. Tho­se who ha­ve en­co­un­te­red the­se ma­le­vo­lent for­ces know this only too well. Ask a mis­si­onary pri­est or mi­nis­ter who has li­ved and wor­ked in fo­re­ign lands if he be­li­eves in de­mo­no­logy and pos­ses­si­on. I'm su­re his ans­wer will be most in­te­res­ting. It is not that the­re are mo­re ca­ses of sa­ta­nism and black witchc­raft in ot­her co­unt­ri­es. Ac­tu­al­ly, the­re are mo­re ca­ses right he­re in our own co­untry. The dif­fe­ren­ce is that we fe­el too ci­vi­li­zed and sci­en­ti­fic to even con­si­der the pos­si­bi­lity of de­mo­nic inf­lu­en­ces.

  How many pe­op­le are suf­fe­ring the tor­ments of Hell it­self in so­me of our men­tal ins­ti­tu­ti­ons to­day simply be­ca­use psychi­at­rists ha­ve la­be­led them as pa­ra­no­id schi­zoph­re­nics when, in ac­tu­ality, they may be un­der de­mo­nic pos­ses­si­on?

  Witchcraft, or wic­ca as it on­ce was cal­led, is the ol­dest re­li­gi­on. It ori­gi­na­ted abo­ut 4000 ye­ars ago. The very word "witchc­raft" co­nj­ures up many dif­fe­rent kinds of imp­res­si­ons to tho­se un­fa­mi­li­ar with its true me­anings and with tho­se who prac­ti­ce it. We are all too awa­re of the in­fa­mo­us witch tri­als of Sa­lem, Mas­sac­hu­set­ts, and of the sla­ugh­ter of tho­usands of in­no­cent pe­op­le in Euro­pe con­dem­ned for so-cal­led witchc­raft prac­ti­ces du­ring the Mid­dle Ages. Even to­day, pe­op­le fo­und to be prac­ti­cing witchc­raft in fo­me back­ward co­unt­ri­es are per­se­cu­ted for the­ir be­li­efs. "Wic­ca" me­ans "the know­led­ge of the wi­ie." It re­fers to the know­led­ge for mi­xing po­ti­ons and he­aling sal­ves from le­aves, ro­ots, ber­ri­es and the many ot­her va­ri­eti­es of plant li­fe. To the prac­ti­ti­oners of this craft, Mot­her Earth is aac­red, and they wors­hip her. They ha­ve le­ar­ned to li­ve with na­tu­re and know many of its sec­rets. Thro­ugh a li­fe of so­li­tu­de, they prac­ti­ce psychic de­ve­lop­ment; long ho­urs of qu­i­et me­di­ta­ti­on and con­cent­ra­ti­on shar­pen the­ir ext­ra sen­ses. Pre­cog­ni­ti­on, the abi­lity o see in­to the fu­tu­re, ast­ral tra­vel, out of the body ex­pe­ri­en­ces, te­le­pathy, men­tal con­tact bet­we­en li­ving be­ings, and ot­her as­pects of the sixth sen­se are de­ve­lo­ped. Un­for­tu­na­tely, pe­op­le with this type of know­led­ge are of­ten con­si­de­red by ot­hers to be stran­ge and we­ird or even harm­ful. What we do not un­ders­tand, or do not want to un­ders­tand, frigh­tens us. To be cla­ir­vo­yant and to use this ta­lent for the be­ne­fit of man­kind can only me­an prog­ress, but our fe­ar of this unk­nown world de­lays our prog­ress.

  At the sa­me ti­me, we must al­so con­si­der what is com­monly re­fer­red to as black witchc­raft or de­vil wors­hip. Whi­te witchc­raft is used for the be­ne­fit of man­kind; black witchc­raft is used so­lely for the be­ne­fit of the black ma­gi­ci­ans, re­gard­less of the con­se­qu­en­ces to ot­hers.

  My own know­led­ge of both whi­te and black witchc­raft co­mes from my in­ves­ti­ga­ti­on of cur­ses put on pe­op­le, ho­uses, and even cer­ta­in lo­ca­ti­ons, so­me of which you will be re­ading abo­ut in this bo­ok.

  Some of the re­aders may be as­king. "Can a cur­se re­al­ly be pla­ced on a per­son or obj­ect?" In ans­wer, let me ask if you be­li­eve that so­me­one or so­met­hing can be bles­sed by a high spi­ri­tu­al per­son such as a pri­est, mi­nis­ter or rab­bi? Thro­ugh a bles­sing, vib­ra­ti­ons of ho­li­ness and pro­tec­ti­on are pla­ced on you. Now you may be as­king, "Pro­tec­ti­on aga­inst what?" Aga­inst the ne­ga­ti­ve or evil for­ces! In the Lord's Pra­yer, did you ever stop to re­al­ly think abo­ut the words, "De­li­ver us from evil…"? What do they re­al­ly me­an? If a per­son of high spi­ri­tu­al ca­li­ber can pla­ce a bles­sing on you or yo­ur ho­me, why can't a per­son with eno­ugh ha­te, cal­ling upon the for­ces of dark­ness, pla­ce a cur­se on you?

  Let me gi­ve an examp­le of the ef­fects of a cur­se pla­ced on a cer­ta­in obj­ect.

  During my many ye­ars of in­ves­ti­ga­ti­on of Sa­ta­nic cur­ses, I ha­ve met so­me very skep­ti­cal pe­op­le. They usu­al­ly res­pond with lo­ud la­ugh­ter to the sug­ges­t
i­on that a cur­se can be pla­ced on them. In fact, in the fol­lo­wing ca­se, a man ac­tu­al­ly di­ed with a start­led lo­ok of dis­be­li­ef on hii fa­ce when the an­ci­ent Egyp­ti­an cur­se in which he didn't be­li­eve was ful­fil­led.

  The man was Bri­ta­in's most fa­mo­us Egyp­to­lo­gist, who had se­arc­hed the sands of Egypt lo­oking for the tomb of the god of me­di­ci­ne. He had be­en war­ned not to to­uch the sta­tue of Ori­sis, the god of de­ath, which wo­uld be fo­und ne­arby. Pro­fes­sor Wal­ter Amory was a sci­en­tist and he was not abo­ut to he­ed any such non­sen­se. Dig­gers at the si­te sa­id that Pro­fes­sor Amorv had many a go­od la­ugh abo­ut the cur­se and in­sis­ted on be­ing the one to pick the sta­tue up. The da­le was Fri­day, March 12, 1971. I won­der what the Pro­fes­sor was thin­king abo­ut a few mi­nu­tes af­ter he had pic­ked up the sta­tue as his eyes rol­led back in­to his he­ad and he lap­sed in­to a co­ma from which he ne­ver awa­ke­ned. By the way, be­fo­re Pro­fes­sor Amory left on the ex­pe­di­ti­on, he hud a tho­ro­ugh physi­cal check-up that sho­wed him to be in ex­cel­lent he­alth. Dr. Wil­li­am James of the Bri­tish Mu­se­um was very dist­res­sed to re­ce­ive the bad news of the Pro­fes­sor's de­ath and re­mar­ked that it was most un­for­tu­na­te how many arch­co­lo-gists met sud­den de­ath in si­mi­lar ca­ses!